delirium happy

Just keep on trying till you run out of cake

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Because I really meant it too
delirium happy

Reply-To: "Raj Sharma" <>
Newsgroups: uk.people.polyamorous
References: <p12L9.935$> <> <0irita.0fh.ln@willow.22cr.intranet>
Message-ID: <Yw8L9.1203$>

"rho" <> wrote in message
> Chris Croughton <> wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:26:07 -0000, Raj Sharma
> >    <> wrote:
> >
> >>Sometime back, there were lots of entries under this group. Now, there
> >>to be hardly any, perhaps my setting on my computer have gone funny, but
> >>they couldn't have all disappeared all of a sudden.
> >
> > It's the nature of this group, short periods of frantic activity
> > interpersed by long times of nothing.  I can't think of another subject
> > to start a flamewar with, though, it's someone else's turn <g>...
> Oh, come now, it's hardly difficult:
> Polyamorous people should not be allowed to own guns.
> Abortion is a particularly important right for anyone in a poly
> The usenet cabal are a bunch of Nazis, prejudiced against poly poeple.
> Due to the inherently monogamous nature of Islam, we should go to war
>  with Iraq.
> etc. etc.
> rho
>    (the usenet poster formally known as rachel walmsley, using a different
>     name now for a variety of reasons)

I agree with some of the things you say, but I am not sure about Islam,
although I am not a muslim and I am not in faviour of that religion - that
religion is not monogamous and allows many wives - up to 10 I believe. (I
don't think it allows many husband though!).

Why do people insist on being so fucking clueless?

  • 1
'Well, at least zie thinks abortion is an important right!' is the only positive thing I can think to say about that.

You almost seem surprised.

(Deleted comment)
Maybe this is the one case where formatted usenet posts are acceptable: your smileys need to be ten feet high. :/

  • 1

Log in

No account? Create an account